Obolkina Svetlana
Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg. E-mail: obol2007@mail.ru
Machine Ontology. The Splendors and Miseries of Machinism
The machine is an intermediary between the natural reality and the impossible reality up to a point. Therefore, understanding this phenomenon in the ontological dimension is a necessary element in the analysis of the problems of both the present and the future. In the philosophy of the 20th and 21st centuries, the concept of a machine is very relevant. Machinism develops around it as a worldview and philosophical direction. However, the machine remains “understandable by default” for it: this concept acts as a tool for analyzing society, culture or the psyche. This turns out to be possible by ignoring a significant part of the semantic spectrum of μηχανή. The exception is the mechanology of Jacques Lafitte and Gilbert Simondon, which is interested in the machine as a particular invention. In this article, the methodology of machine analysis relies on the object-oriented ontology by Ian Bogost. Based on the conducted research, a number of conclusions has been made. Firstly, it is possible to talk about the identity of reality and the machine only for the basic ontological level; a person has created an artifact, which is an objectified ontological constituent. However, at the next, higher level, this identity falls apart: the machine is what it is, because it does not coincide with natural reality being distinguished by the nature of its existence. The invention of the machine is an ontological work in its nature: it is the creation of an interaction system of one-dimensional spaces. In its reasoning, machinism does not take into account these conceptual points using the machine as a metaphor. Therefore, its conceptual resources interfere with the understanding of modern machines and their interaction with humans. Secondly, some modern inventions in the field of generative artificial intelligence are new types of machines (non-classical machines) that include the factor of probability and ambiguity as an element of the mechanism. Human invention is reaching a new ontological level, which requires an updated conceptual toolkit.
Keywords: machine, invention, machinism, mechanism, philosophy of the machine, machine ontology, non-classical machine, artificial intelligence, neural network
PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF MARGINALITY PROBLEM
The article analyzes the notions of marginality in socio-psychological and cultural dimensions. Today, two opposing epistemological tendencies have emerged: first, marginality is assessed positively as a synonym for the notion of creative renewal. The second tendency emphasizes the destructive role of marginality for the individual and society. Primarily, these tendencies are formed due to not quite correct approximation, and even identification of two meanings: “liminality” – “marginality”, on the one hand, and “lumpen” – “marginal”, on the other. Therefore, the scope of the concept of “marginal” is so wide, and often includes phenomena with the opposite social function, which causes many researchers to doubt its scientific significance. The intention of the article is philosophical reflection over cognitive attitudes, which has created modern understanding of marginality. The goal is to find semantic constant in equally important but opposite semantic vectors of this concept. The key concept of the meta-language in relation to the theme of marginality is concept’s prehension category, which makes possible to talk about specifics of convergent meanings, and to consider ontological prerequisites underlying their identification. Further, modern understanding of social marginality is analyzed in the context of its original meaning: “marginalia” as a note on page side (margin). This helps to rethink the fundamental metaphor serving as the cognitive guide to the study of marginalization process. The author examines it in the context of P. Bourdieu’s theory of social fields, as well as the philosophy of the Other. The notion of the mythologeme “own/alien”, and “homo sacer” formula in solving the question of semantic constant of “marginality” suggests that marginality is related to the category of social norm, and the norm itself is apophatically determined by the phenomenon of marginality.
Keywords: marginal, marginality, liminality, lumpen, concept’s prehension, doxa, social norm.
Virtuality Machines
Modernity is facing a pronounced deficit of the real, prompting philosophy to undertake efforts to ‘unmask’ the nature of virtuality. The scope of the concept of virtual reality is continually expanding, with its content allegedly characterized as ‘invalid’ and/or ‘simulative’. In addition to that, the ideas of the real and the virtual are converging in a diffusive process. This article proposes a framework for understanding virtuality that utilizes classical ontological concepts to examine the practical mediation between reality and virtual reality. The first section discusses the theoretical challenges that arise in conceptualizing virtual reality. It concludes that virtual reality is more an act of realization manifested through the activities of both ontological and ontic subject, rather than a distinct entity. The second section analyzes individuals as subjects of such realization following Nikolai A. Nosov's research into virtual psychology. It also emphasizes the importance of those systems through which reality undergoes virtualization. The third section introduces the concept of a virtuality machine to analyze these mediators facilitating the transition from the constant to virtual reality. Since media philosophy tends to posit that media is far from being neutral, this section explores various media/mediators of virtuality machines: including chemical, computational, and musical. The author examines both the potential threats posed by virtuality machines and their promising applications. The concluding section proposes that a virtuality machine has the potential to evolve into a virtus machine, a tool that could enhance rather than alienate human nature.
Keywords: virtuality machine; virtual reality; machine; computer technology; computer game; neural network; tonal music; virtus
Technological Civilization and Human Corporality
The phenomenon of interconnection between the human body and technical de- vices is considered as a peculiarity of technological civilization. The analysis is developed on the ground of philosophical anthropology, human corporality is used as the main category. Engineering, technological civilization, engineering philosophy, anthropological approach, corporality, paradigm of corporality, techno evolution.
GENERAL AND SOCIAL ECOLOGY AS VERSIONS OF SCIENTIFIC STRATEGY
The article contains brief analysis of philosophical-cultural and methodological prerequisites of general and social ecology. General ecology in contrast to social ecology demonstrates the object adequacy and methodological constituency. That is why the use of its methodological thesaurus enables foreseeing perspectives of new and more effective scientific strategy of ecology.
Keywords: general ecology, social ecology, evolutional paradigm, reductionism, energy approach, culture, civilization.
Ontological Dimension on the Borderline between Antiquity and Middle Ages
The article suggests the analysis of ontological strategies in the period of late antiquity and early Middle Ages. The author pays special attention toward second” sophistic. Ontological dimension of the epoch is considered as interaction and rivalry of philosophical, Gnostic and patristic traditions.
Keywords: ontology, sophistic, Gnosticism, hermeneutics, patristic, theory of nomination, mythological approach toward language.