Free subscription at
the electronic version of journal
Subscription index
in the Russian Post
catalogue – 43669
Foundation of journal. Issue topics About journal


— showed 2 articles from2



Koval Oxana , Kriukova, Ekaterina

In general, the following article attempts to showcase how literature reflects and interprets philosophical concepts using a rich arsenal of inherent expressive means. The personality and ideas of Martin Heidegger, one of the most influential thinkers of the 20th century, often became the subject of literary reflection. The focus of this article is the second phase of the philosopher’s life – from 1933, when he assumed the post of rector of the University of Freiburg, and until his death. The poets and writers involved here (E. Jelinek, E. Jandl, A. Kluge, B. Kenjeev, G. Grass, P. Celan, T. Bernhard, W. Abish) create a multidimensional and complex image of Heidegger in their works. The biographical and imaginative twists and turns of the legendary philosopher come to life under the magnifying glass of writer’s reflection, for which the boundary between reality and fiction remains suspended. This allows us to understand the nature and motives of the philosopher better than any documentary evidence or even the direct speech. The language of literature – derisive, caustic, grotesque – creates necessary counterbalance to philosophy, which, according to laws of genre, gravitates to mortal seriousness and thereby loses its critical attitude towards itself. Such a combination of literary imagination and metaphysical speculation turns out to be productive both for philosophy, which tests its ethical relevance in the poetic dimension, and for literature, which turns into a space of authentic existential questions. The fiction not only reveals inconsistencies in Heidegger’s train of thought but offers its own unconventional arguments to cope with those inconsistencies.

Keywords: Heidegger; literary character; fiction; philosophy; narrative; intertext.

Download article TPL_IPL_ARTICLE_PDF


Skorobogatskij, Vjacheslav , Skorobogatskaja, Natalja

The article deals with the historical and cultural context of the Soviet phenomenon. With the unprecedented frequency of the use of the term “the Soviet”, the phenomenon designated by it remains a “white spot” for social science. The author proceeds from the assumption that the possibility of its theoretical study is due not so much to the choice of methodological tools (this is an important matter, but still a derivative), but to a change in the perspective in which we put this phenomenon in front of us as a subject of study. We do not talk about changes in point of view or approach, not about changes in worldview or methodological plan, but about entering the field of meta-methodology, where various factors are intricately combined – cultural, historical, institutional, political, ethical, etc. At the same time, the focus of the study is shifted from the cognizable object to the cognitive capabilities of the subject, transferred from “what?” to “how?”. This area or infrastructure of theoretical research is a set of theoretical and social apriori, implicitly directing the way of thinking, its course and the way of interpreting the results. In the course of the study of the historical and cultural context of the Soviet phenomenon, the following results are obtained: The Soviet is presented as a special type of culture that combines the dimensions of locality and worldliness and as the Soviet continue to grow it degenerates into a project of world civilization. The birth of the Soviet is considered as one of the possible outcomes of modernization, the conditions of which prevailed during the historical turning point from “tradition” to “modernity”, and the specific combination of heterogeneous cultural strata in the space of Russian City during the industrialization. The Soviet is the existence of potestarity, an attribute inherent in the community matrix. The pursuit of power as a super-value constitutes the entelechy of the Soviet. The development of the Soviet culminates in the emergence of the cultural code, which determines the reproduction of the Soviet regardless of economic, social and political conditions, and the mass dissemination of revolutionary dialectical discourse. The architect of the Soviet is Stalin. Nevertheless, in the world of the Soviet Stalin is not a historical person, not a way of ruling, but a basic myth that defined and defines the boundaries and ways of transformation of the Russian society, even in the XXI century. The novelty of the proposed concept of the Soviet is associated with the justification of the leading role of cultural factors of its constitution and development in comparison with economic, social and political ones. 

Keywords: Soviet as a type of culture; communal matrix; revolutionary dialectical discourse; anti-capitalist attitude; power as entelechy of the Soviet; cultural code of the Soviet; corporate beginning in life of society and state.

Download article TPL_IPL_ARTICLE_PDF